| Q: |
How
do implants compare to conventional bridgework both in function and
in esthetics when the need to replace a missing tooth/teeth? |
| A: |
The goal
of any treatment is to be as conservative as possible while establishing
the most predictable long term result. When deciding between implants
and conventional bridgework, the first question to ask is whether
the adjacent teeth need to be restored. If the answer is no, then
grinding down healthy teeth to be used as anchor teeth is very aggressive
treatment which will permanently compromise those teeth long term.
The next
question to ask is in the event that the adjacent need to be restored
is this reason enough to opt for conventional bridgework or should
implants still be considered? The biggest obstacle to implant dentistry
is the need for surgery. However, once this procedure is complete
the rest of the treatment can usually proceed much simpler than
conventional dentistry and usually without anesthetic. Furthermore
an implant does not rely on the adjacent for support therefore each
tooth will continue to carry its own weight. This takes less pressure
on the remaining teeth.
Finally
there is no risk of future decay or pulpal problems with implant
restorations compared to conventional restorations. It should be
noted that these two problems account for 80% of the failures associated
with conventional bridgework. Thus even though there is a surgical
component, the use of implant dentistry to replace missing or failing
teeth may turn out to be the most conservative treatment long term
and the most predictable.
|
| Q:
|
What
about smile makeovers and will they last? |
| A: |
Again
there is no absolute answer for every situation and it will ultimately
depend on what the treatment involves. Mechanical or functional principles
must be respected if the end result is to last long term. |
| Q:
|
Should
I have veneers for an immediate smile makeover or should I consider
orthodontics (braces) for that new smile I really desire? |
| A:
|
This
question has no absolute right or wrong answer since each case is
different. What is important is that a thorough discussion involves
the benefits and risks of either treatment. Any treatment should
be based on longevity and ease of maintenance. Thus it is important
to know that any dentistry no matter how well completed will NOT
last forever. Therefore if the smile makeover can be completed without
restorative procedures (say orthodontics and bleaching) then the
long term results will be much more predictable. If on the other
hand the teeth involved in the smile makeover require restorations
for structural reasons, then restorations only if possible and no
orthodontics would be the most practical. Most cases may require
both.
|
| Q:
|
Should
we use veneers or crowns and what about black lines and black triangles?
|
|
A:
|
It may
be interesting to note that veneers under the proper circumstances
will be every bit as strong as full crowns. The critical factor
is the length the veneer will extend beyond the natural part of
the tooth being restored. When this is minimal (less than 2mm) the
choice is a veneer and not a full crown, provided the remaining
tooth structure is sound.
|
| Q:
|
What
about bleaching? |
| A: |
This
procedure can be performed in a number ways. It can be done by the
patient using over the counter products or with special trays made
in the dental office with a bleaching gel provided by the dentist.
It is important to monitor the color change or the benefit may be
difficult to measure. A starting shade is a simple of monitoring
the results. Bleaching can also carried out in the dental office
by the dentist or the hygienist to produce quick results. This may
be supplemented with take home kits to continue the process.
|
| Q: |
What
about perio appointments and frequency? |
|
A:
|
This
is based on patient specifics but to answer some common questions
regarding plaque removal and frequency of appointments. Plaque requires
24 hours to form once its removed, so the number of times patients
should brush and floss their teeth in a day is enough times to remove
all the plaque off all the surfaces of all the teeth. If that can
be managed in one pass the answer would be once per day. If removal
of all the plaque off all the surfaces of every tooth cant be
achieved in ten passes, then the answer is more than ten.
The next
question to follow is,
assuming that not all the plaque
has been removed from all the surfaces of all my teeth with my home
brushing and flossing, how long can this plaque sit on my teeth
before I have to worry about aggravating my gum problems?
The scientific literature tells us that it takes approximately three
months for calculus to reform under the gum once it has been meticulously
removed. The source of mineral for tarter under the gums (subgingival
tarter, as compared to tarter above the gums, supragingival tarter,
which is the saliva) comes from the blood supply in the gum tissue
around each tooth. Therefore the more blood supply around a tooth
(i.e. the more inflammation) the more likely the calculus is to
reform underneath the gum and therefore the more potential there
is for further breakdown in the support tissues surrounding the
tooth. Thus if you have a gum condition evidenced by bleeding or
deep pocket readings (greater than 3mm) its more likely your
dentist is to recommend 3-4 month cleanings to try to manage the
gum problems. Reference an article.
|
| Q: |
What
about insurance?
|
| A: |
As
a rule our office does not accept the assignment of benefits from
the dental insurance company. Financial arrangements are made on an
individual basis especially for comprehensive cases where the significant
financial investment is involved.
|